UNCONSTITUTIONAL


Our Founding Fathers Rejected
FREE TRADE And So Should We


Chapter Samples Buy the Book

In the News: China Tariffs, Nearshoring, Exports

Yellen says lifting China tariffs premature. “‘The tariffs were put in place because we had concern with unfair trade practices on China’s side — and our concerns with those practices remains,’ she said. ‘So perhaps over time this is an area where we could make progress, but I would say it’s premature to use this as … Read More

Rep. Jim Banks Bill To End Normal Trade Relations With China

“Granting China MFN status was a mistake, and we applaud Congressman Banks and Senator Hawley for introducing legislation to remedy it,” said CPA Chairman Zach Mottl. “Supporters of granting China MFN status wrongly predicted that the CCP would become more open, democratic, and free market oriented.” Read the article.

Lighthizer’s terrible new book

Another free trader who think the views of Adam Smith should direct trade policy for the U.S. He refuses to acknowledge that when George Washington signed the Tariff Act of 1789, it imposed a tariff of 5 percent on the majority of dutiable imports for “the encouragement and protection of manufacturing in America.” Read the … Read More

Adam Smith’s Presumption for Unilateral Free Trade

The article states “the burden of proof is on protectionists to justify government-erected obstacles and not on free traders to justify keeping commerce free.” This is not true. The U.S. Constitution says we are To regulate commerce with foreign Nations and that Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States. The term “free … Read More

Trump’s Trade Policies Were Poor, Sadly, Biden’s Are Much Worse

Apparently, this writer thinks President Biden’s trade stance is even more protectionist than former President Trump’s. If free traders think our trade policies are increasingly more protectionist, we should be encouraged as even more national economic prosperity is around the corner. Read the article.

CPA Statement On House Passage Of The FY 2024 NDAA

The House FY 2024 NDAA contains A provision prohibiting American taxpayer funds to be used for research in or in connection with China, but failed to include an amendment that prohibits the retirement savings of all federal employees, including Members of the Armed Forces, from being invested in China. Read the article.

China criticizes German call for reducing dependency on Chinese products as ‘protectionism’

“Anyone who listens to China knows with what self-confidence it will decisively influence the development of our world — more repressive at home and more offensive abroad,” Baerbock said. “China has changed and so our China policy must change too.” It noted that “whereas China’s dependencies on Europe are constantly declining, Germany’s dependencies on China … Read More

How Bidenomics has busted the free trade rule book

Familiar articles of economic faith like globalisation, free trade, free markets, deregulation and minimal government direction and market intervention have ceded policy ground and political support. Now the economic mantra is about national resilience and self-sufficiency entwined with national security and enforced through mechanisms like domestic protectionism and state industrial policies and spending. Read the … Read More

What the World Doesn’t Understand About China’s Ambitions

How naive that the London School of Economics professor and author of the new book “The New China Playbook,” Keyu Jin, actually believes “that one of the biggest misconceptions is that China is trying to displace the US.” In October 2022, Chinese President Xi said his goal was to ensure that China “leads the world … Read More